Recurrent lumbar radiculopathy (RLR) occurs between 5-15 % of cases.
AMA 4 does NOT specially address the situation of rating a back injury by the 'injury model' after there has been surgery. This is a MAJOR DEFICIENCY in the use of AMA 4 by insurers with a high incidence of RLR due to various factors.The philosophy of AMA4 is that radiculapathy is not quantifiable and, once it is present , it is permanent! Thus, there is no increase in the rating when recurrent radiculopathy occurs.While this may not seem fair, the philosophy of AMA 4 is that radiculopathy can be assigned to a person once only. THIS IS NOT A WELL KNOWN FACT AMONG INEXPERIENCED PI ASSESSORS.
AMA 5 includes revisions for rating PI of the spine that will in many cases be different compared with AMA 4. AMA 5 includes criteria for rating recurrent radiculopathy.The ROM Method is used (AMA 5 pp 380-381) and apportioning instructions are to subtract the prior injury rating (by using the old injury model of AMA 4) from the current rating (by using the ROM Method).
In summary : (i)AMA 4: verify presence of a radiculopathy including loss of reflexes, unilateral atrophy,and differentiators , including electrodiagnostic evidence. determine if any ratable impairment is present, including loss of motion segment integrity. Impairment is then based on the INJURY MODEL.
(ii) AMA 5: Determine the appropriate method for assessment, then apply the specific method to suit the case specifics.
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR MICHAEL CORONEOS CIME MASE
SENIOR NEUROSURGEON & PI ASSESSOR
CIME & MASE
NATIONAL RACS EXAMINER & SENIOR RACS MORTALITY ASSESSOR (QASM).
CIME MASE FAIM FRACS FACS FRCSI FRCS(EDIN)SN MB BS(1ST CLASS HONOURS) MNSA MNSQ MAPS MANZSOM
Silverton Place Brisbane City AND Sunnybank Private Hospital consulting Suites New street facing building up ramp! SPRING HILL QLD